Mar 11, 2016

Free Will and Fate in Slaughterhouse Five


In Slaughterhouse Five, the theme of free will, or rather lack thereof, is commonly brought up. Vonnegut jumps upon this idea very quickly as he speaks of the inevitability of death in Chapter 1.
In his conversation with Harrison Starr, it is said:

“Is it an anti-war book?”
            “Yes,” I said. “I guess.”
            “You know what I say to people when I hear they’re writing anti-war books?”
            “No. What do you say, Harrison Starr?”
            “I say, ‘Why don’t you write an anti-glacier book instead?’ ” (4)

In the conversation, Harrison Starr compares war to a glacier, a huge body of dense ice, constantly inching forward under it’s own weight. He suggests that war is inevitable and unstoppable and that despite the supposed notion of free will, there is nothing anyone can do in preventing wars from taking place. Vonnegut goes on to say, “And even if wars didn’t keep coming like glaciers, there would still be plain old death,”(4) building upon his point that war, or rather the most important consequence of war, death, is ever present.

Later in the novel, Vonnegut further explores the concept of fate through Billy’s experiences with the Tralfamadorians. These little green men see time a little differently than we humans. While we think of time as linear, the Tralfamadorians ability to see the fourth dimension allows them to view different moments of an object at the same time. Billy explains that, “When a Tralfamadorian sees a corpse, all he thinks is that the dead person is in bad condition in that particular moment, but that same person is just fine in plenty of other moments." (34). This description suggests time is not linear but rather it is cyclic; every moment has happened, is happening, and will happen. Billy affirms this by saying, “All moments, past, present, and future, always have existed, always will exist.” (34). The idea that the future has already happened suggest the notion of fate, and the inability to change our destiny. In support of this, Vonnegut states, “Among the things Billy Pilgrim could not change were the past, the present, and the future.” (77). Furthermore, the Tralfamadorians also say:

“If I hadn’t spent so much time studying Earthlings, I wouldn’t have any idea what was meant by ‘free will.’ I’ve visited thirty-one inhabited planets in the universe, and I have studied reports on one hundred more. Only on Earth is there any talk of free will.” (109)

Now the question is, is time is really as the Tralfamadorians describe it? In reality there is no way to tell. One might argue that as a human, we have the conscientious mind to decide what we will do at a given moment; we can even change what we do whenever we choose to. However, it can be argued that a mere human's feeble attempt at playing fate may have been predestined in the first place. Can’t it be possible that you were destined at that moment to attempt to play fate, by “consciously” changing your mind. Exactly, there’s no way for us to tell whether or not we truly have free will and it’s a little bit scary thinking of it. There’s literally nothing you can do to change your life, what was, is, and always will be. 

4 comments:

  1. This was too real man. I'm gonna be trying to doze off tonight and then I'll start to think if everything we do is actually predetermined by some unstoppable force. And then the next thing I know, I don't get any sleep because my wee little brain can't handle these massive philosophical ponderings. And then I go through my day like Billy Pilgrim all spaced out and careless, but with out the cool time travel stuff. But really, I liked this post. I enjoy the idea of free will, but books like Slaughterhouse-Five do get you wondering if our lives are already planned out.

    ReplyDelete
  2. For those who read the novel as a complex, metaphorical representation of Billy (and by extension Vonnegut's) postwar trauma, this view of free will holds an appeal that's pretty easy to understand: if part of Billy's issue has to do with survivor's guilt, or trying to make sense of the total arbitrariness of who lives and who dies, then we can see why it would be comforting to say "the moment is structured that way"--we can't change the past, present, or future, and everything is the way it had to be. There's a peace to be found in the Tralfamadorian viewpoint, but it's a point of view that's really hard for most of us to achieve, stuck as we are in time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think the question of free will also weighs on Billy's mind throughout the book. In the war scenes, he is often not angry or sad that he has to repeat the experiences, and he never tries to change what happens. He seems to accept that he doesn't really have any ability to change what happens in his life. This is also seen is how he adopts the "so it goes" attitude.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I know I have free will because I live in the good ol' US of A dammit. But in all seriousness, the argument of free will is really heavy. The whole are my actions predetermined makes you question all the things you have done, and what you could have done differently. Then you start trying to fake out destiny by doing stupid crap that you know you would never do, but then you realize that you are destined to do that. My head hurts.

    ReplyDelete